Innovation as a business: more than creativity

Fig_1_3 copInnovation means much more than invention. Managing innovation means managing both newness and change, and the latter often matters the most.

Fig_1_4Newness is relative. What is today new to one manager, its organization or its environment might not be to another.

Fig_1_5Innovation is about changing people’s perceptions and realities, combining many small steps and a few big bets

Bibliography

Innovation means much more than invention

  • (Book) Berkun, S. (2010), The myths of innovation, O’Reilly Media, Inc..
  • (Book) De Brabandere, L. (2005). The forgotten half of change: achieving greater creativity through changes in perception, Kaplan Publishing.
  • (Book) Latour, B., Woolgar, S., (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
  • (Book) McKeaown M. (2008) The truth about innovation, Pearson Prentice Hall
  • (Book) OECD/Eurostat (2005) Oslo Manual, 3rd edition
  • (Book) Schilling M.A. (2006) “Types of Innovation” in Strategic Management of Technological Innovation (2d ed.) McGraw-Hill, Irwin,
  • (Book) Schumpeter J.A. (1939), Business cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis, McGraw Hill, New York
  • (Book) Tidd, Joe, Bessant, John and Pavitt, Keith (2005) Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. 3rd edition. John Wiley.
  • (Video) IBM Innovation Man
  • (Video) Sesame Street: Paula Patton and Elmo – Innovation
  • (Video) Tom Kuczmarski – How to Ignite a Culture of Innovation
  • (Article) Baregheh, A., Rowley, J., & Sambrook, S. (2009). Towards a multidisciplinary definition of innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339.
  • (Article) Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845.
  • (Article) Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: a guide to the literature. Working paper
  • (Article) Hage, J. T. (1999). Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual Review of Socioogy, 25(1), 597-622.
  • (Article) Kastelle, T., & Steen, J. (2011). Ideas are not innovations. Prometheus, 29(2), 199-205.
  • (Article) Levitt, T. (2002). Creativity is not enough. Harvard Business Review, 80, 137-144.
  • (Article) Linton, J. D. (2009). De-babelizing the language of innovation. Technovation, 29(11), 729-737.
  • (Article) Mortensen, P. S., & Bloch, C. W. (2005). Oslo Manual-Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD.
  • (Article) Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1977). In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, 6(1), 36-76.
  • (Article) Rothwell, R., Freeman, C., Horlsey, A., Jervis, V. T. P., Robertson, A. B., & Townsend, J. (1974). SAPPHO updated-project SAPPHO phase II. Research Policy, 3(3), 258-291.
  • (Article) Stauffer, Dennis A. “Valuable novelty: a proposed general theory of innovation and innovativeness.” International Journal of Innovation Science 7.3 (2015): 169-182.
  • (Article) Wolfe R.A. (1994), « Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions », Journal of Management Studies, 31(3) p. 405
  • (Article) Zhang, J. A., Garrett-Jones, S., & Szeto, R. (2013). Innovation capability and market performance: the moderating effect of industry dynamism. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17(02), 1350004.

Newness is relative

  • (Book) Evans, H., Buckland, G., & Lefer, D. (2009). They made America: From the steam engine to the search engine: Two centuries of innovators. Hachette UK.
  • (Book) Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. Penguin UK.
  • (Video) J Bezos the electricity revolution
  • (Video) The Transformation of the Desk by TechSoEasy
  • (Article) Berry, H. (2015). Knowledge inheritage in global industries: ‘The impact of parent firm knowledge on the performance of foreign subsidiaries’. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1438-1458.
  • (Article) Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 692-710.
  • (Article) Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of product innovation management, 19(2), 110-132.
  • (Article) Snyder, H., Witell, L., Gustafsson, A., Fombelle, P., & Kristensson, P. (2016). Identifying categories of service innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2401-2408.
  • (Article) Talke, K., Salomo, S., Wieringa, J. E., & Lutz, A. (2009). What about design newness? Investigating the relevance of a neglected dimension of product innovativeness. Journal of product innovation management, 26(6), 601-615.
  • (Article) Van de Ven, A.H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
  • (Article) Wei-Ken, H., & Lin-Lin, C. (2012). Effects of novelty and its dimensions on aesthetic preference in product design. International Journal of Design, 6(2).
  • (Article) Yayavaram, S., & Chen, W. (2015). ‘Changes in firm knowledge couplings and firm innovation performance: the moderating role of technological complexity’. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 377-396.

Many small steps and a few big bets

  • (Book) Govindarajan, V. and Trimble, C. (2010) The other side of innovation: solving the execution challenge” Harvard Business Review Press
  • (Book) Hargadon, A. (2003). How breakthroughs happen: The surprising truth about how companies innovate. Harvard Business Press.
  • (Book) Hege, J. B. (2001). The Wankel rotary engine: a history. McFarland.
  • (Book) Tushman, M.L. and O’Reilly, C.A. (2002) Winning through Innovation, Harvard Business School Press,
  • (Video) Dick Fosbury flop – Mexico 1968 high jump final
  • (Video) Vijay Govindarajan: why most companies fail at innovation
  • (Video) What is innovation? de Rafa Galeano (on Vimeo)
  • (Article) Adner, R., & Snow, D. (2010). Old technology responses to new technology threats: demand heterogeneity and technology retreats. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(5), 1655-1675
  • (Article) Ansari, S., & Garud, R. (2009). Inter-generational transitions in socio-technical systems: The case of mobile communications. Research Policy, 38(2), 382-392.
  • (Article) Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1-17.
  • (Article) Chang, Y. C., Chang, H. T., Chi, H. R., Chen, M. H., & Deng, L. L. (2012). How do established firms improve radical innovation performance? The organizational capabilities view. Technovation, 32(7), 441-451.
  • (Article) Damanpour F. & Evan, W. (1996). ‘Organizational innovation and performance. The problem of organizational lag’, Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 29, 392-409.
  • (Article) Dewald, J., & Bowen, F. (2010). Storm clouds and silver linings: Responding to disruptive innovations through cognitive resilience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 197-218.
  • (Article) Dewar, R.D. & Dutton, J.E. (1986). The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422-1433
  • (Article) Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117-132.
  • (Article) Furr, N.R., & Snow, D.C. (2014). Intergenerational Hybrids: Spillbacks, Spillforwards, and Adapting to Technology Discontinuities. Organization Science, 26(2), 475-493.
  • (Article) Gatignon, H., Tushman, M. L., Smith, W., & Anderson, P. (2002). A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management science, 48(9), 1103-1122.
  • (Article) Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P.K. (2006). Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 189-199.
  • (Article) Henderson, R.M. & Clark, K.B. (1990). Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failures of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
  • (Article) McDermott, C. M., & O’Connor, G. C. (2002). Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(6), 424-438.
  • (Article) Mezias, S.J., & Glynn, M.A. (1993). The three faces of corporate renewal: Institution, revolution, and evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2), 77-101.
  • (Article) Phillips, W., Noke, H., Bessant, J., & Lamming, R. (2006). Beyond the steady state: managing discontinuous product and process innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 10(02), 175-196.
  • (Article) Sainio, L. M., Ritala, P., & Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P. (2012). Constituents of radical innovation—exploring the role of strategic orientations and market uncertainty. Technovation, 32(11), 591-599.
  • (Article) Schiavone, F. (2011). Strategic reactions to technology competition: A decision-making model. Management Decision, 49(5), 801-809.
  • (Article) Slater, S. F., Mohr, J. J., & Sengupta, S. (2014). Radical product innovation capability: Literature review, synthesis, and illustrative research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 552-566.
  • (Article) Tongur, S., & Engwall, M. (2014). The business model dilemma of technology shifts. Technovation, 34(9), 525-535.
  • (Article) Tushman, M.L. and Anderson, P. (1988). “Technological discontinuities and organizational environments” Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439-465.

One Comment Leave a comment

Submit comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Identify the bibliographic reference you are commenting.